or talking out of your arse.

merely merely my interpretation of the stated basis of epi's intelligence

Epiglotis

Yes, I have to admit that I've always found some knowledge of what I'm writing or speaking about is a worthwhile pre-requisite. At least that saves me from making a prat of myself in the way you have over VDW generally, and Guest's bets in particular.

If you are not a greater prat than I am I can only assume that you are as incapable of judging my PQ as you are of my IQ.

did you notice like a butterfly pre race?,i would like to know what she weighed in at today as she clearly looked a good few kilos over.i was quite surprised really considering the prize money on offer.
you have got to give credit to limestone i thought he was going to get back up,he is a real star.

Guests bets,
he could outdo anyone anywhere anyplace for making an ar**hole of himself,unless it's after the event.
Fulham,
you are a fine example to all followers of this thread,of how to be up yourself without really trying,to you it comes naturally,
Now remember everybody:-

Consider only Group,listed,graded and class A,B,C races.
Only consider market leaders 1st 4 hcps,1st 5non-hcps.
Eliminate all runners lto < 30 days.
Only consider these 4/5 if price is < number of runners in race.
Add last 3 places in formline.
Total prize money divided by total races won divided by 100.
Prize money of last race divided by 100.
Bet on ALL q/f's who have a clear advantage in all 3 fields Con/AB/Class.

Remember at all costs,VDW is not a system of any kind.
Q.

i now know where i have been going wrong,

Sorry to jolt your bollocks once more but in my naevity I have two more questions. First one is for Mtoto, Fulham and anybody else who is a member of an alternative VDW dedicated board. My question is, has Guest every been, and if so for how long, a member of any respected VDW only board? Second one is to the student type visitor. Can you convince me that anybody on this thread has anything worth puzzling over for 20 years about?

One of the most under-appreciated philosopher/psychologists of the 20th century was best known by the name Agatha Christie. The person who has as a serious aim the understanding of human motivation and it's consequences can do no better than to study the words of Hercule Poirot. Yet I haven't been able to locate any groups of people who either believe in the corporial reality of HP or the other thing, guess I'm drunker than I thought but it makes no difference as they wouldn't've took my drift even if there were sharks snapping their heals. You should've read that sentence before I took a piss, took me 20 minutesto to unravel it. The second point was boring: Fulham's belief in the veracity of VDW is based upon consistency, I say HP said a lot more and of more meaning with at least equal consistency. First thing that struck me when I read the VDW stuff was it's written in a professional style.

Quinelle,

Why do think this thread needs the rules according to you printed here? They have very little in common with VDW thinking.

I also disagree with you first statement. I think your good self could easily take that accolade, although I can think of one person that give you a good race.

I may not agree with Guest but arsehole he is not. I think when the word is used about you I would prefix it with stupid and/or rude.

Don't bother to answer this as I will not reply. I would rather forget that rude stupid arseholes like you exist

Sorry if I'm the 2nd you meant. I am not asking anybody to explain their personal method but can you justify or explain Fulham's answer to Grundy?

Limestone Lad has been very kind to me from a punting point of view,And max he's not a star,He's a superstar in my eyes.

Epiglotis,

Sorry I don't know which question you are talking about. I have always found Fulham very straight forward, and forth coming. If he doesn't want to answer a question isn't that his privilege? and I am sure he must have a good reason for not doing so.

Oh. as far as I know Guest (if I have the right person) has been a respected member of VDW groups for longer than myself.

Be Lucky

Thanks for the reply. Sorry but today I dont want to wade through my achikochinio post to locate the one that you meant, but do you remember one time Swish said the (whatever) might as well 've been written in swahili?

Wax loquacious.

Hi all,
Thanks for reading my post and not slating me.
Walter, I didn't take the % into consideration only the evaluation as VDW wrote it.
I have gone down the road of percentages and abandoned it as I think what he was showing was just another way of saying that consistent horses win races.
The fact he chose to ignore King and Country and The Engineer was that they weren't good enough.
Epiglotis, the pasage is in The Golden Years and called VDW spells it out.
Thanks again, see you soon,Mike.

I cant be bothered to write it, Barney last chance to be saved: simple question, 2 choices
1.Mister Ed is one of the finest brains in the field of horse racing
2. Mister Ed is empty even of shit and anybody with half a brain would find this test ridiculous.

Some of us haven't got the books. It would be very helpfull if you were to post the passages that you reacted to.