Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
![]() |
The Vital Spark Member ![]() |
|
||
|
Member |
Jib
Hmmmm still plenty of venim in the sack then. ![]() |
||
|
Vanman Member |
what do you know about modern british society?
|
||
|
Vanman Member |
have you been reading about it?
|
||
|
Jolly Swagman Member ![]() |
barmy - strikes me that most members of "modern british society" would regard this as "eutopia" !
quote: You of course, would prefer to continue living on your "sink estate" - locking your doors against the gangs of "yobs" outside, and subsidising every illegal immigrant who chooses to come into this country - whilst "Blair" and his New Labour - crony ; - "lawyers" - live off the " Fat of the Land" and send our "Lads" to die in Iraq - for the benefit of their egos ! This message has been edited. Last edited by: Tuppenycat, |
||
|
The Vital Spark Member ![]() |
Barney,
Every time you cash your Giro cheque you admit your defeat. It keeps you alive but denies you life. Each one that you hand in has the cumulative effect of destroying your dignity whilst it simultaneously weakens your resistance. Do you think, if you put all your force together, you could manage to do without your social security for just one month sometime before you die? Dont you think the satisfaction would be worth many times more than the monetry returns and their inherent petty comforts that you would have spurned? |
||
|
Jolly Swagman Member ![]() |
barmy -
when you'r - "in a hole" - and no one "throws you a ladder" - then - "Stop Digging" !!! This message has been edited. Last edited by: Tuppenycat, |
||
|
Vanman Member |
john in canary wharf, answer the question, fantasist.
|
||
|
Member |
Be patient with him Barney, like "all" things it takes time to sink in.
![]() |
||
|
Vanman Member |
Not-g-hall,
how can it sink in if he doesnt see it? Too busy reverting to type. Trying to be clever. END This message has been edited. Last edited by: Barney, |
||
|
Jolly Swagman Member ![]() |
Monday - 3 most consistent - Winners/Loosers
Consistency figs of Winners vs VDW prediction of 3 most const' Race "class" follows race time. H 2:15 e 706- L not in the 1st 5 in the betting H 2:45 d 000- L H 3:15 d 002- L H 3:45 c 527- L not in the 1st 5 H 4:15 e 204- W H 4:45 d 033- L S 5:10 e 433- W S 5:40 e 241- W S 6:10 g 422- W S 6:40 f 155- L not in 1st 5 S 7:10 f 053- W S 7:40 f 399- W W 5:25 d 000- L not in 1st 5 W 5:55 d 605- L W 6:25 e 144- W W 6:55 d 626- L W &:25 d 333- W W 7:55 e 763- W 9 VDW winners from 18 races 4 races won by a horse not in the 1st 5 in the betting |
||
|
The Vital Spark Member ![]() |
|
||
|
Vanman Member |
I think they had the right Idea leaving you in the cold, thats just what I am going to do.
See you in six months. There is a chance you may have changed your tune by then, I very much doubt it though. But I'm big enough to give you ANOTHER chance. Nao estou com pressa. |
||
|
Member |
W 7:00 Chivite
|
||
|
The Vital Spark Member ![]() |
A Deus! Não precisa voltar com pressa!
PS. Are you going to take your dull ass flogger with you? This message has been edited. Last edited by: john in brasil, |
||
|
The Vital Spark Member ![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Member |
I have not been visiting this site for long and I am not surprised at the amount of sarcasm in some of the postings from the same people, there is only one reason why this kind of posting is put forward, I wonder what it could be!!!
![]() ![]() Instead of using the time to post drivel, the time would be better served in studying previous postings in order to learn what they seek, the answers "are" there. This would take the ![]() ![]() I have seen it posted, oh i only come here for the laugh, nah that will not wash, we all know why you are "really" in the vdw forum, don't we. |
||
|
Member![]() |
great banter
what has amazed me about this thread is the amount of winners people claim. in fairness to vdw there are a few things to take out of his works. i dont believe in the consistency theory,but that is probably because i bet in different areas to vdw. is consistency important when a horse has a stone in hand in a claimer for example? |
||
|
Member |
Hi Greg.
The banter is excellent in here. The consistency is an integral part of vdw's method for a very good reason, even in a claimer (if I should bet in such a race). Your thoughts of exploring different areas are constructive and it would serve others to follow suit. Some of the winners that certain people in here claim to have had are fact, of that you can be assured, for it is no coincidence that at least five people who do not know each other (well some of us anyway) in here consistently come up with the same selction in a race. |
||
|
The Vital Spark Member ![]() |
This message has been edited. Last edited by: john in brasil, |
||
|
Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by groupee community | Page 1 ... 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 ... 854 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
|